
Recently I installed Ubuntu 7.04 on my computer and have enjoyed it very much. I discovered a new release was made 7.10, named the Gusty Gibbon. It turns out the version numbering scheme Ubuntu uses is the year (07) and the month (10) of the release. That makes a lot of sense to me. How often have you looked at downloading software only to find it has not been updated in years?
I mainly use my system for software development, so I had not made many modifications to the original installation beyond installing Java, NetBeans, various Java libraries, etc. Ubuntu provided an upgrade option that, instead of downloading an ISO image, burning a CD, etc., I just clicked an button in the Update Manager that said update. It seemed too good to be true, but (after backing up my system) I gave it a try. For the curious, they provide instructions on doing the upgrade and cautions that you can only do this if you have version 7.04.
The process went very smoothly. The upgrade wizard warned me that several packages I had installed were no longer supported and could be removed. One of those packages was Emacs, which I’ve used for decades. I decided to let the system remove it as I could reinstall it later. It turns out that the install wizard later installed a newer version for me. It would have been nice if they had reworded those warnings to say that newer versions would be installed as opposed simply removing the existing ones.
As the update process continued, I was asked if I wanted to keep or replace various configuration files (I chose to replace them as I had done very little customization). After downloading and installing over 1300 files, the system rebooted and all appears to be working fine.
This version of Ubuntu includes the capability to write to the NTFS (Windows) file system. This is pretty handy (for me) as I am currently dual booting to access certain applications available only in Windows. There are various other improvements you can read about on Ubutntu’s web site.